The Sneaky Way Your Job Is Getting Free Overtime Out Of You

Crunching the numbers on this a while ago, which was all I was missing to be starting my way-too-early day at work that $extra$, that you get by sacrificing all your free time. Counting all those tiny increments, twenty minutes "getting ahead" before start time, remote-approved lunch at the desk while the phone rings, 30-minute email worming after dinner, you get the picture.

Added up to just over six hours a week. Six hours, unpaid, that I had never once thought of as "working for free" because none of it felt like real OT. No one made a show of asking me to stay late. It just kept happening, on the downlow, in fifteen-minute "quiet time" gaps I didn't even register anymore.

Just out of curiosity, how many of you saw your CLOCK IN time? As you can see, CLOCK IN is 6:45. I clocked into work.

That's what the time on the clock said I was on.

I clocked into work at 6:45. I was not physically sitting in my work chair at 6:45. I was not physically punching out of work at 4:45. I was still sitting at my desk working.

I just don't put in 8 hours...you do the math.

The real scope of this, which is actually bigger and more normalised than many realise.

Unpaid overtime. The results of numerous big unpaid overtime studies usually hover in a like, and the average salaried employees is between five and 8 unpaid hours a week once you establish all the hours of very early logins, working with lunch, late-night email, and the tap of work-related distracts within the toss of personal time. Some studies, including those that are location around remote and hybrid works only, put the number even greater, due to the fact that the physical marker of "leaving an office" has currently been removed.

Imagine doing that all year and it doesn't sound so trivial. Six unpaid hours a week adds up to more than a month a year of full-time equivalent labour that's given without ever leaving the body of the 6 hours a week as something you have to negotiate, ask for or even think about most of the time.

Why it isn't exactly overtime but, functionally, is.

Here's what makes it so deceptively easy to ignore for such a long time. Conventional overtime has a distinct form, an explicit request to work late, a defined project, a clear timeframe, an apparent before and after. It's visible, and since it's visible, it's presumably negotiable, measurable, occasionally remunerable.

The contemporary iteration doesn't resemble it at all. It's broken up into chunks across the entire day and night, not one of which seems big enough to be worth calling "extra work." Fifteen minutes on Slack this evening, another ten in the morning before I sit down to answer a question or two. Because it's never one ask a person might feel comfortable resisting, it never seems like a thing worth me making note of.

The 'salaried, so it's fine' myth that's taking a quiet toll on many workers

There's a pervasive un-criticised assumption that going from hourly to salary rids the question of hours working altogether, because if you get paid the same amount regardless then why does hours work matter? That assumption does a fair bit of the normalising of unpaid overtime, not because it makes sense but because on the surface it seems to.

A salary is, after all, effectively the cost of a specific job, and a fair expectation of hours. Not as many hours as you think you want to work all the time, forever, if you're on a good salary. If your contribution to each paycheck is the same as it ever was, the bonus is the amount of money per hour you spend working has continually and silently declined without anyone saying a word. (Nobody has to give you a new instruction or tell you they want more hours for you; you just have to work more for the same money.)

How this pattern actually occurs, since hardly anyone sets out to work for free.

Most of the time it begins small and sensible. Just a genuinely busy week where it makes sense to work a little bit later, or check an email at night because there's a clear deadline for something. No harm in that by itself.

It's the and after. The behaviour, once it's broken, doesn't typically stop, not because anyone consciously wants it to, but because no one actually makes a conscious decision to stop it, and everyone else automatically recalibrates to the new, defacto condition you've set. One week of needing to work a bit harder out of genuine necessity can, without anyone needing to think about it, stick around for the long term, and make it seem as if you're not actually working so much harder.

Increase email deliverability (forward to a friend) Left Above is a diagram. Click below to download a free copy. A significant point that you probably did not stress when learning HTML is that tables can be nested, that is, can be used inside other tables.

What actually helps: What seems to tend to work in practice.

Initiala, even to yourself. Whether you have done it, you will have never really done the sum of your unpaid hours as I finally did; it's the number itself that will always be what is finally a catalyst, because once your time is quantified and made concrete and transparent and no longer feels like a fuzzy sense of the thing you will find it is so much more difficult to sustain.

Reinforcing an established boundary, intentionally now, just the way it was set and enforced without thought for the majority of the workday. Leaving work at a set time, consistently and not just sometimes. The exact cutoff is irrelevant, consistency is what establishes the boundary, so that others don't keep pushing to see where it really is.

Distinguishing between a temporary surge in effort that is coming from somewhere and a new long-term standard. It's okay to be busy for a couple of weeks before a launch; it's not okay for the same level of frenzy to be the new normal half a year on and no longer driven by any particular project.

Things you could actually say if it's a truly authentic pattern and you need to get onto it.

Doesn't have to be a battle. A more neutral, factual framing usually plays better than emotional, something like factually reporting that the workload is regularly running to far more hours than scope was currently designed for, and wondering if that's right or if we need a discussion about scope, prioritisation, resourcing, etc.

The upshot of this framing is that it puts the actual decision back where it belongs, with whoever's in charge of workload and resourcing. Not leaving it as something you are just supposed to absorb in silence forever and ever without your manager ever having consciously decided that was the plan.

The bigger thing worth sitting with.

It wasn't many people opting out of six or seven unpaid hours a week. It emerged, gradually, from tens and hundreds of small individually sensible decisions, that could never be revisited once their original rationale had ceased to exist. The problem wasn't so much the figure, then, it was the fact that everyone just carried on indefinitely repeating the same assumptions, month after month, until that number became expected rather than decided.

Worthy of doing your own weekly maths at some point, I swear, the way I did. Not to wallow in it. Just to have a real look at the number, because it's almost impossible to fix something that hasn't been named properly to begin with.